If you don't want to look like a whore, don't act like one. http://tinyurl.com/pnf2g3l
unfollowed this asshole for this nasty victim shaming. he makes SJWs look like they have a point.The article he linked is about minors being victims of revenge porn, then being told to go fuck themselves by revenge porn help hotlines, and sometimes by their teachers/schools, too.
This borders on legitimization of under-18 porn, and all he wants to do is blame the underage victims who had their rights violated.
If we'd just let HIV run it's course, we'd have corrected about 50% of the problems in the West.
unfollowed this asshole who wishes death on gays. he makes SJWs look like they have a point.
we solve problems with ideas, not death.What kind of person thinks that a bunch of people he doesn't like being dead is how to make the world a better place?
you are an anti-scholar and a thug.
If you illegally jump the border, you shouldn't have any protection under the law. Including from assault, rape and murder.
unfollowed this asshole who is pro-murder. WTF. he makes shitlibs look like they have a point.If you miss your flight and overstay a visa, should everyone be allowed to murder you, too?
And what happened to due process? Shouldn't they at least get a trial before they are raped for their alleged crimes?
"You are blocked from following @Krauserpua and viewing @Krauserpua's Tweets. Learn more"I expected to be ignored. I did not expect to be blocked. What a thin skin he has for a guy who advocates raping and murdering people for a non-violent crime.
someone sure couldn't take criticism...
This is a guy who advocates changes to medical research policy for the express purpose of more homosexuals dying than Hitler managed to murder. For his own twitter description, he wrote "Horrible bastard" (that's the whole thing). But he can't take being called an asshole and being unfollowed.
> Raising the price of HIV drug by 5,000% may be the first time a Jew has ever acted in the interests of straight white men.
Anti-Semite to boot.
This seems uncharacteristic of you. I'm not sure why.
I think I might have mistakenly associated you with (implicitly) endorsing this sort of cruel mentality because you endorse PUA and there *is* a ton of terrible stuff like this associated with PUAers.
Also are you sure he's not shitposting?
You shitpost. Why? How is it different from being a liar?
> I think I might have mistakenly associated you with (implicitly) endorsing this sort of cruel mentality because you endorse PUA and there *is* a ton of terrible stuff like this associated with PUAers.
Premise 1: Both bob and Jane endorse activity X.
Premise 2: Jane likes activity Y.
Conclusion: Bob likes activity Y.
Do you agree with this logic?
PUAs like Mystery, Style, RSD and Girl Chase do not say anything like Krauser.
Why are you associating Krauser's stuff with PUA? That is simply your mistake due to ignorance of the high quality (and on topic) PUA material available.
I see no reason to think Krauser doesn't mean what he writes. You're just making an arbitrary unargued speculation in defense of evil.
When I don't mean something, I'm clearer.
> This seems uncharacteristic of you. I'm not sure why.
You could have asked a question whenever you wanted, rather than silently assuming the worst.
Why were you following him?
Someone showed me some of his PUA stuff about e.g. rates of converting phone numbers.
Following is not endorsement, it's seeing what someone is about. Sometimes I read stuff from CNN or NYT too, awful as they may be. Whatever.
> rates of converting phone numbers
like, you go outside and get 100 phone numbers. then you try to set up dates with those people, but you only get dates with 30% of them – that's a rate of converting a phone number into a date. then you try to fuck the people you get dates with, and that only works 30% of the time, which is another conversion rate. (made up numbers)
o_O what kind of a goal is that?
>PUAs like Mystery, Style, RSD and Girl Chase do not say anything like Krauser.
>Why are you associating Krauser's stuff with PUA? That is simply your mistake due to ignorance of the high quality (and on topic) PUA material available.
Why is that a mistake? It's part of PUA.
The fact that there is *some* quality to PUA doesn't stop the bad stuff from existing, or stop it from honestly being called PUA.
Associating with PUA without the disclaimer of "but not this evil stuff" is associating with and endorsing the evil stuff too. When you talk about PUA as if only the good stuff exists you're being misleading and lying to yourself.
> When I don't mean something, I'm clearer.
Clearer to who? Beside yourself and a small select group of people that know you well enough to know you don't mean it?
To someone who doesn't know you, you're just lying. You're compromising on honesty for a joke.
how is being a bigot part of PUA? what does being pro-murder have to do with picking up girls????
if Mystery was a scientologist on the side, or a creationist, it wouldn't make those things part of PUA.
stuff that isn't related to social dynamics, picking up girls, etc, is not part of PUA. foreign policy is not part of PUA. being a socialist or capitalist is not part of PUA.
i don't get how you don't get this.
>> This seems uncharacteristic of you. I'm not sure why.
> You could have asked a question whenever you wanted, rather than silently assuming the worst.
I know. I did say "mistakenly".
There are way too many questions to ask them all at once. This one got delayed for more interesting ones.