curi: Think!

 ######   ##     ##  ########   ####
##    ##  ##     ##  ##     ##   ## 
##        ##     ##  ##     ##   ## 
##        ##     ##  ########    ## 
##        ##     ##  ##   ##     ## 
##    ##  ##     ##  ##    ##    ## 
 ######    #######   ##     ##  ####

[Previous] Programming and Epistemology | Home | [Next] Whirlwind Tour of Justificationism

Think!

I made a new philosophy website.

http://curi.us/think/

It won't look right in Internet Explorer.

Elliot Temple at 1:08 AM on April 25, 2010 | Permalink

Comments

Missing button

Where's the "I'm not confused, but I still disagree with you" button?

Alan Forrester at 4:34 AM on May 23, 2010 | Permalink

What do you disagree about?

Elliot at 6:41 AM on May 23, 2010 | Permalink

Missing Button

I agree; the current set up is, in your lingo, infallibilist.

Larks at 12:53 AM on June 7, 2010 | Permalink

Hi Larks,

So, I designed the links this way for some reason.

Do you know what that reason is? What is it and what's infallibilist about it?

If you don't know, then why do you assume it's an infallibilist reason?

Elliot at 9:33 AM on June 7, 2010 | Permalink

I wasn't saying the reason behind it was assumed infallibility, but that the practice made it hard to criticise ideas.

Larks at 8:22 AM on June 10, 2010 | Permalink

So, if there was an "I disagree, but want to go to the next page anyway" button, how exactly would that result in more criticisms being written? You don't seem to have been prevented :-)

Elliot at 8:26 AM on June 10, 2010 | Permalink

Godwin

Fallible Ideas

Think

Dialogs

Blog Archives

Recent Comments

History of Greece

Think!

Comments

Missing button

Missing Button

Post A Comment